RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The safety of the laparoscopic treatment of intestinal malrotation remains controversial. This study compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgical treatment of intestinal malrotation. METHODS: A multicentric retrospective study included pediatric cases of intestinal malrotation operated on between 2005 and 2016. RESULTS: This study included 227 children with a median age of 17â¯days (0-17.2â¯years), including 161 with a midgut volvulus. Forty-six(20.3%) procedures were started by laparoscopy and 181(79.7%) by laparotomy. Laparoscopy was more frequent for elective surgery (45.9%) than for emergency procedures (10.8%, pâ¯<â¯0.001). Conversions were significantly more frequent during emergency procedures (66.7% vs 17.9%)(pâ¯=â¯0.001). Considering only 61 elective surgeries, the mean hospital stay was significantly shorter after laparoscopy (5.3â¯days +/-5.2 vs 10.1â¯days +/-13, pâ¯=â¯0.01), the overall complication rate was comparable (15.8% vs 21.7%, pâ¯=â¯0.7) but post-operative volvulus was significantly more frequent after laparoscopy (13% vs 0%, pâ¯=â¯0.04). Outcomes of the two approaches were not significantly different after 166 emergency procedures. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy can be performed by experienced team for the treatment of selected cases of intestinal malrotation. Conversion to open surgery should be done with a low threshold, as the rate of volvulus recurrence is concerning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
